Luke | Chapter 4

Luke 4:1-2

“The condition of the temptation”

 

• Introduction
• 1-2 The condition of the temptation

 

Introduction

 

As we start the 4^th chapter we have just concluded the early aspects of our Lords life from His dedication at the 8^th day of His life, to His coronation and consecration at His baptism to what is before us now, namely His temptation, all of which brings us to the doorstep of His earthly ministry.

When we consider the temptation account it is unique as its source could only have come from Jesus Himself and passed down to His disciples.

As we start our study it is important to note that Luke’s account isn’t the only one where you will find mention the temptation. In fact three of the four gospel accounts with the only one not mentioning it John’s.

Below are the other accounts of the temptation of Jesus.

• Matthew 4:1-11
• Mark 1:12-13
• Luke 4:1-13

Each of the gospel writers adds information that the other accounts don’t mention, and each looks at the temptation of Christ from their own perspective. For instance, Matthew shows Jesus confronting the devil’s empire of evil as God’s anointed King.

It is interesting that from Matthew’s perspective the same three temptations directly correspond to how the world-kingdoms have attempted to establish their governments.

• The bread basis which is caring only for the physical
• The false religious basis which emphasizes the spectacular
• The compromise basis which suggests that you can have what you want as long as you compromise

We will briefly note the differences found in Luke whose emphasis is on the personality of Jesus.

What all three accounts agree on is that as Luke says in verse 13 that the devil’s “personal” temptation didn’t end after these three temptations. I think it is important to understand that what each of these three gospels record, which is the “temptation of Christ”. It is just that as Christ is a word that is specific to the Messiah which makes these three temptations “Messianic” in their application towards Jesus. That isn’t to say that Jesus wasn’t tempted “personally” but rather that this is a Messianic temptation and it wasn’t limited to those three as Jesus was tempted throughout those 40 days.

These three temptations represent satan’s attempt to thwart God’s purpose. These temptations are not so much the devil attacking the Person of our Lord Jesus as they are him attacking the Purpose of the Living God.

Luke switches the 2^nd and 3^rd temptation from the historical account, and I believe that he does this to show how the perfect man handles the three areas of temptation which are the same as Adam and Even were tempted:

• Bread = Personally
• Temple = Socially
• High mountain = Spiritually

As it relates to the personal temptation of Jesus, those had been ongoing since His birth and would continue until His death. The truth about those personal temptations are the topic of interest from the author of Hebrews when we read, Heb. 4:15 in the ASV. says this: “For we have not a high priest that cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but one that hath been in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.” It is such a comfort to know that Jesus understands all that we weak humans go through, but more than that, he has shown us the way through our weakness: trust in His word. As we look at these temptations, you will notice that they are the same ones faced by us and that the answer is always found in our surrender to His Word.

There is something equally fascinating to me that, as you consider the first Adam and the second Adam (1 Cor. 15:15), they were both tempted by Satan, yet the surroundings were vastly different, as was the outcome.

• Adam was tempted in a beautiful garden.
• Jesus was tempted in a barren, forsaken desert.
• Adam ate freely of all things in the garden except one tree.
• Jesus ate nothing for 40 days.
• Adam was in perfect health (no effects of sin).
• Jesus was on the verge of death. 

What Adam lost in the garden Jesus won back in the desert. I have broken this passage apart into three sections to better our examination:

• 1-2 The condition of the temptation
• 3-12 The process of the temptation
• 13 Being watchful after the victory

We will only deal with the first part this week and follow this outline.

My last observation before we start the text is that clearly God never attended that man to face temptation on their own strength. In fact we have the same resources that Jesus used when He faced and defeated satan plus one other:

• Prayer as noted in Luke 3:21-22
• The Father’s love (Luke 3:22)
• The power of the Holy Spirit (4:1)
• The Word of God as noted in Jesus own words when He said it is written.
• We have one other resource according to James 1:1-8, 13-17 and that is we have Jesus in heaven interceding on our behalf.

 

Vs. 1-2 The condition of the temptation

Vs. 1-2 There are four things of note here in regard to the conditions of the messianic temptation, two are positive, two are negative:

Positive:

• Jesus was filled with the Holy Spirit
• Jesus was Led by the Holy Spirit

Negative:

• Jesus was in the wilderness
• Jesus hadn’t eaten in 40 days

 

Though the order of these three temptations differs from Matthew to Luke (Luke reversed to 2^nd and third temptations). I believe Luke knew the historical biblical order of Matthew which we know is the actual chronological order that they happened and Luke’s recording the way he does is not contradicting Matthew’s account.

Luke’s focus is upon the only three areas that man can be tempted as seen in 1 John 2:16 where we are told, “For all that is in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—is not of the Father but is of the world.”

There is the fleshly, the aesthetic and the spiritual or intellectual. It was this way with Eve in the garden according to Genesis 3:6:

• We note that Eve saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food thus it appealed to the flesh, thus the lust of the flesh.
• We note that it was pleasant to the eye, thus the lust of the eyes.
• Lastly, we note that Eve saw that it was desirable to make one wise, thus the pride of life.     

 

Matthew’s account is the historical order while Luke’s address the moral order which is what the author of Hebrews in 4:15 was addressing.

There are several general things to consider:

1.) The timing of the test was right after Jesus’ baptism and blessing. What this reminds us is that testing seems to happen that way in our lives as well. It is often right after some great blessing or victory that spiritual battles come.

2.) The circumstances of the test:

“led by the Spirit…tempted by the devil.” Here is what every believer in Christ faces daily in our experience, whether we are going to be led by the Spirit or led astray by the temptation of the flesh. What we see is that the perfect man (Jesus) deals with what we face in everyday life. Humanly speaking, He was “led by the Spirit,” in other words, this was not something He went on His own. Mark’s account uses the least amount of words but the most suggestive words, “the Spirit DROVE Him into the wilderness….tempted by satan and was there with the wild beasts”. Mark’s wording implies three things about this temptation:

• 12 Eager willingness: Mark use his favorite word “immediately” but does so in conjunction with something most of us would NEVER get excited over, not just a TEST but a temptation! Furthermore, not just any test, a test administered by a lying, murder who has designed the test not to see what you have learned but to ensure that you fail! The devil had given other tests to other people like Job, but this test was even more severe.

The word “drove” in the Greek implies something very different than what we think it means in the English as in the English we use the word “drove” to imply reluctance on Jesus’ part. When we compare the accounts of Matthew and Luke, we see that those two writers used very different words to describe Jesus’ journey into the wilderness to be tested as their word means was “led up” and “was led” which is the emphasis upon the Holy Spirit guiding. But Mark uses the word that implies Jesus’ perspective in going which speaks not of reluctance but rather of preoccupation of mind in going. Mark will use the word again in chapter 1:34, 39 speaking casting out or driving out demons. I believe we get the picture of Jesus’ intent as He couldn’t wait to drive out the evil influence in the world. This isn’t a picture of reluctance on Jesus part it is a picture of complete and absolute CONFIDENCE.

That is what happens when light comes into darkness it drives out the night. We don’t need to stomp or swing our arms in the dark we just need to turn on the LIGHT! 

• Mark 1:13a also implies a Complete examination: Mark points out the thoroughness of satan’s examination. The word “tempted” is in the “present tense” which speaks of a continuous action. The three temptations that Luke and Matthew record at the end of the 40 days indicate the intensity of the temptations as the end of the 40 days as satan knew his time was short.
• The place of the temptation: The “wilderness,” was the barren Judean desert. A place of solitude and severe conditions. We ought to remember this as we are being tempted to go after something in the flesh, that though it may appeal to our flesh, it is in fact a barren waste land void of any value.
• The person of temptation isthe devil. The examiner was none other than the devil, a word in the Greek that means “adversary”. The word “tempted” in the Greek is a word that means to “pierce in search of”.

The word came to mean to “try intentionally with the purpose to discover weakness, to purposefully solicit a person to do evil.” Satan is the author of sin and the father of lies; Jesus, therefore, in winning here would show forever His ability to overcome evil. 

• 2 The condition of the person being tested. The longevityof the test being 40 days and nights. When you look at the number 40 in the Bible you discover something very interesting as the number is almost always associated with testing or judgment.
• Noah’s flood: It rained 40 days and 40 nights
• Israel in the desert: They wondered 40 years
• Moses kept his father in laws sheep 40 years after slaying the Egyptian in Egypt
• Jesus: Tested 40 days 

In all the other cases mankind failed the test. Also of interest is that after 5 days of a fast, most people lose the sense of hunger, and they do not experience it again until they begin to starve to death. Though I’m certain that the Spirit sustained Jesus with the food of fellowship, satan used that as a temptation, to which Jesus responded that what sustained him was fellowship. The fact that after the 40 days and nights Jesus was hungry tells us that His body was dying; He was starving to death. 

Luke 4:3-13

“The temptation of Christ”

• Introduction
• Vs. 3-12 The process of the temptation
• Vs. 13 Being watchful after the victory

Introduction

As we started our look at the temptation of Christ by first noticing that the temptation account is unique as its source could only have come from Jesus Himself and then passed down to His disciples. We also noted the overall familiarity of the story three of the four gospel accounts with mention with the only one not mentioning it John’s. 

• Matthew 4:1-11 
• Mark 1:12-13
• Luke 4:1-13

We spent a brief amount of time noting some of the differences that each writer has with the main difference being that Matthew’s order is historical, whereas Lukes is moral as Luke switches the 2^nd and 3^rd temptation but both focus on the Messianic nature of the temptations in comparison to the personal nature which is covered by the author of Hebrews in 4:15 where we read, “For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weakness, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin.” 

Lastly we noted the contrast between Adam and the 2^nd Adam, Jesus, where we saw that what Adam lost in the garden Jesus won back in the desert. Now that we are up to date we will pick up the last two parts of our outline:  

• Vs. 3-12 The process of the temptation
• Vs. 13 Being watchful after the victory

Vs. 3-12 The process of the temptation

In verses 3-4 we start out looking at the first temptation which corresponds to “The Lust of the Flesh” in 1 John 2:16 we are told that “all that is in the world; the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life; is not of the Father but is of the world.” 

You will notice these three baits in the temptation of Jesus and ultimately in our own experiences as well. Every temptation we face will be in one of these three categories. Lust of the flesh, Lust of the eye, and Pride of life.

Vs. 3 In Matthew’s account in 4:3 he uses the word “when” the tempter came; it is not an “if” but a “when with regards to his temptations. Again remember that Jesus was recorded to be tested 3 times during these 40 days; he was being tested the whole time, but we have only 3 of them recorded. “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.” The word “if” is actually better translated “since” as there was no doubt in satan’s mind as to who Jesus was. 

In Luke 4:34, the demon said, “Let us alone! What have we to do with You, Jesus of Nazareth? Did You come to destroy us? I know who You are; the Holy One of God!” 

What the devil is saying, “Why don’t you use your divine powers to satisfy your own fleshly appetite?” In this region the ground is covered with loaf-shaped rocks, so satan comes and uses this to tempt Jesus. What this reminds us that we often think that the temptation is something that is far from us and we will see it coming, but more than likely it is something right under your nose. “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread,” is the lust of the flesh. This test was on the physical level and tested the ideals for the kingdom. It was a test of loyalty and aimed at getting Jesus to question the Father’s vision. It is satan saying, “Since you are the Son of God, why is the Father allowing you to starve?” “Go on, use your divine powers to satisfy your own needs; you’ve got the power to do it, and He is not doing anything about your needs!” 

We face this one all the time. “Look at all of those bills piling up! If God loves you, so why are you so broke?” You better go out there and take another job, because He is not going to help you!” Or perhaps you’re single and you really want to get married, but you just haven’t met anyone. So satan comes in and says, “Hey, look, God is not concerned with this, so why not just go out with that non-believer? He won’t care; just do it in your own power.” So what’s the answer?

Vs. 4 This is found in Deut. 8:3. In fact, all of the scriptures Jesus quotes from are found in Deuteronomy. It was the summary of the law and was written by Moses to a new generation so that they might obey. So what is Jesus saying? He is saying greater than any need I have in the physical realm, I have an even greater one in the spiritual realm, and that is fellowship with God. And fellowship with God cannot happen if I am disobedient. Jesus answers him saying, “It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by EVERY Word of God.”

Notice Jesus says, “every word,” not just the ones that we agree with, but every word is inspired. This is much more than just the inspiration of scripture, it is the sufficiency of scripture. The problem with the Bible is not that it doesn’t have anything to say, but rather that what it has to say makes us uncomfortable at times. 

So in Jesus’ biblical reply he says, “The best of my existence is found in relationship with the Father, and I trust Him for everything.” In Ps. 119:11 we read “Your Word I have hidden in my heart, that I might not sin against You!” It does us no good just to know the Word; we must apply it in your life. In other words, if all we do is say, “Man does not live by bread alone,” it does us no good. We need instead to say, “I’m not going to live in the material realm, having the physical appetites rule over the spiritual ones. No, I’m going to live the way God has made me, dependent, trusting in Him alone to meet my needs! 

In verses 5-8 we are looking at the second temptation which corresponds to “The Lust of the eyes” in 1 John 2:16.

This is where Luke differs from that of Matthew’s account and this one deals with The Lust of the Eyes. 

Here satan attempts to get Jesus to question the Father’s promise, and you see that this temptation is concerned with the plans of the kingdom. 

Notice as well that all three temptations have THREE THINGS in common 

• All of these temptations are an attempt to get Jesus and us to compromise! 
• All of them deal with doubting God in some way, whether that is His provision, promises or protection! 
• Also, in every instance, Jesus always goes back to the Word of God. Notice that satan’s attempt is to get Jesus, (as well as us), to use the circumstances, trials and situations of our lives to interpret who God is, and Jesus’ answer is always the opposite, always using who God is to interpret the circumstance or situation. For example; I know God is good, He is holy and just, and He only wants and knows what is best for me. Therefore, there must be a reason I need to go through this situation…usually for my spiritual growth and maturity.

Vs.5 Here we have the setting of the temptation; though, we are not told upon what mountain Jesus was taken. There are several mountains in the vicinity of Jerusalem, and when atop them, you could survey a great deal of Israel. In Deut. 34:1-3, we read of one of them that “Moses went up from the plains of Moab to Mount Nebo, to the top of Pisgah, which is across from Jericho. And the LORD showed him all the land of Gilead as far as Dan, all Naphtali and the land of Ephraim and Manasseh, all the land of Judah as far as the Western Sea, the South, and the plain of the Valley of Jericho, the city of palm trees, as far as Zoar.” 

Vs.6-7 This temptation was aimed at Jesus dealing with God’s promise as Jesus had come to win these kingdoms back by going to the cross. Jesus in the 3^rd temptation will win the victory in the spiritual realm by declaring that there was no need to put God to the test. But satan here says, “OK, no need to put the Father to the test; here is what you have come for; here are those kingdoms; they are yours, and I will make it easy for you. Why do you need to die? Just acknowledge the gift I’m offering you and show your gratitude towards me.” 

We need to understand several things as it relates to this temptation: 

• First, who owned the right to the kingdoms? This is best understood by the text as Jesus does not refute satan’s claim as to who had ownership of them, just the means to obtain them. 
• Second, when did satan gain control of the kingdoms of the world? The answer is way back in Gen. 1:28, where God gave dominion over all that He created to mankind through Adam. When they fell in the garden, the title deed went over to satan. In John 14:30, satan is called the prince of the world, so satan has been given a certain amount of control over the kingdoms. 2 Cor 4:4 tells us that his main deal is to blind the minds of the people to the truth concerning the gospel. Now Psalm 2 tells us that these kingdoms have been promised to Jesus, but they are only won by way of the cross (verse 8).

This is important for us to understand and is the reason the world is in the shape that it is in. People are always blaming God for the pain and suffering in the world. The fact is that the world is under the rule of satan and is in rebellion against God because of man’s sin. So all the pain and suffering in the world today are a result of rebellion against God. When Jesus comes back, there will be no more suffering, hunger, pain, or disease. 

We also get great insight into satan as he would rather have worship and recognition than all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. Which is what we are told in Isa. 14:13-14, where we read about satan, “I will ascend into heaven; I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; I will also sit on the mount of the congregation on the farthest sides of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High.” 

Vs.8 Now we move to Jesus’ answer again from Deut. 6:13. In essence, Jesus says that He will never compromise with evil. “I will get these kingdoms from the Father, His way.” 

Vs.8 And Jesus answered and said to him, Get behind me satan! For it is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve.

The phrase “Get behind me, satan” we note that Jesus is saying, “You offer Me the kingdoms of the world if I acknowledge you by paying you homage; I will take these kingdoms by kicking you out.” 

Folks, the truth we learn is that whatever god we serve, we are worshiping! You cannot serve two masters! If you are serving the systems of world, pleasure, power, money and popularity, then you are worshiping the wrong god. Only One is worthy of worshiping, The Savior of your souls. Don’t be fooled by the lure of shiny things; there is nothing brighter than the “old rugged cross.” 

The third temptation found in verse 9-12 correspond to 1 John 2:16:“For all that is in the world; the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life; is not of the Father but is of the world.” 

Vs.8-9 Then he brought Him to Jerusalem, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here. For it is written, “He shall give His angels charge over You, to keep You.” And Jesus answered and said to him, “It has been said, You shall not tempt the Lord your God.”

Vs.9 In Luke’s account this is the third temptation and falls into the category of the pride of life making it a spiritual temptation and is concerned with the laws of the kingdom. It is to get Jesus to doubt the Father’s protection. Look at the location of this temptation, as it reveals how Jesus was being tempted.

• First, we have the words that inform us that, “The devil brought him and set Him on the pinnacle of the temple.” The word “brought” literally means to accompany or to lead. The word “set” means “had him stand” in the N.I.V. version, and I think it carries the thought better from the Greek. It is not referring this in some supernatural way, as satan did not hold Jesus up in the air and set Him on a spire. Neither does it mean that satan forced Jesus to go against His will. There is no evidence in scripture that satan has the power to do either of these two things. All it’s saying is that satan accompanied or took Jesus to Jerusalem to the temple with himself. 
• Second, we have location or the setting of the temptation. The Holy City was called this because the temple was there. Jerusalem was the center of all cultural life for the Jewish people, and it all revolved around the temple. He was standing on the “pinnacle” of the temple. When we read this, our minds think that He was on the top of some very tall tower, but it is here that the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus help. The word “pinnacle” literally means a little wing. There is nothing in the Word that says that Christ was placed on the top of a spire. Herod’s temple was on the top of Mount Moriah, and it had two wings, the northern and the southern. The southern was the most grand of the two, both with its decor, “Solomon’s Porch,” as well as scenic beauty; it overlooked the valley of Kedron some 700 feet below. Josephus says that one could not look down without becoming dizzy. It is most likely to this spot that Jesus was taken. The greater question is twofold: Why and what does it have to do with the temptation?

To understand the why, we only need to go back to the first temptation. There Jesus declared the superiority of the spiritual over the physical. Jesus said, “In My kingdom the greatest need of man is fellowship with the Father; it is greater than any other need, even greater than My hunger.” So here satan takes Jesus to the center of spiritual life for His kingdom, the temple in Jerusalem. 

Vs. 10-11 tells us what it has to do with the temptation. In Matthew’s historic account this temptation is the 2^nd and is right upon the heels of that victory over the temptation to place the physical above the spiritual and satan comes with these words. “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down. For it is written, ‘He shall give His angels charge over you,’ and ‘In their hands they shall bear you up, lest you dash your foot against a stone.” 

This is a partial quote or a misquote from Psalm 91:11-12. Again, the word “if” is better rendered “since.” So satan has this temptation by saying, “OK, since the spiritual is over the physical and you trust God’s provision for you to prove it!” “You say you believe God’s Word; then why not prove that you trust one of His promises, say the one in Psalm 91:11-12?” 

You can imagine this as Jesus is 700 feet above the canyon with people looking up? The King, the Messiah, and satan is asking Jesus to do something “spectacular” in front of the crowd, proving both God’s love for Him and proving that He really is the Messiah. That is the temptation. “You don’t need the cross and suffering; just trust God, and by doing this, you will demonstrate that you are the Messiah in front of all these folks.” 

I suggest to you that the moment we begin to test God as to His love for us, we show that we do not trust Him. Perfect trust waits; the moment we need some sign or some proof, we show we don’t trust. 

Suppose now I just stepped out in front of a speeding car to push you out of the way, saving your life, but the car hit me so hard that I’m near death lying in a hospital. Finally when I come too, you come to visit me. And say me, “Dale, I sure appreciate you saving my life and all, but I want some proof of your love for me. Is there not something you could do to show me you love me? I mean, perhaps you could pay my bills for a few months, or you could give me a pay raise.” Now, to be honest, I most likely would ask you to get out of my room. But we do this all the time to the Lord: show me your love; do this for me; do that for me. Don’t you know that He showed His love for you on the cross, dying for you? What more proof do you need? 

Vs.12 So here we see how Jesus answered this temptation again with the Word of God out of Deut. 6:16. If we were to go back to Psalm 91:11–12, you will see that satan leaves something out of his quote. “For He shall give His angels charge over you, to keep you in all your ways. In their hands, they shall bear you up. Lest you dash your foot against a stone.” satan deliberately left out that little phrase, “To keep you in all your ways.” 

Jesus knew that satan left out the fact that God was promising to keep His promise as we keep His ways. 

Jesus quotes His answer which is to do something without the Bible’s authority is to sin; to tempt God to dare Him to intervene and rescue us when we have been deliberately disobedient is a good way to find yourself in a bunch of trouble.

Jesus is saying, “Yes, the Father will protect me, but I don’t need to put that to the test to satisfy the truth of it to you or anyone else, for scripture says that you are not to put God to the test.” We don’t need to test God’s love for us by seeing how close to the world you can live and still be called a Christian. That’s just stupid! 

Vs. 13 Being watchful after the victory

Vs. 13 We are told elsewhere that satan left him until an opportune time. He was probably back the next day. Folks, the keys are here: 

• We do battle with the enemy by staying in constant fellowship with God. 
• We do this by meditating upon His Word and ordering our lives by it. 

Mark notes that the wild beasts and the angels were present with Jesus. 

• Wild beasts were with Him: Neither Matthew nor Luke record the wild beasts, but Mark does as he places the Greek emphasis on the word “WITH” which changes the meaning of the phrase to the fact that Jesus was at peace with the wild beasts. This fact reveals two very important truths:
• Jesus enjoyed a relationship with His creation that hadn’t been experienced since before the fall. We are told in Genesis 1:28 that Adam and Eve were to “have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” This indicates that during those 40 days of temptation Jesus remained sinless and always had authority over His creation.

• Furthermore we are told that during the 1000-year reign of Christ upon the earth. According to Isaiah 11:6 “The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.” This also indicates the future fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy as he describes Jesus in chapter 11 as having “The spirit of the Lord resting upon Him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord.” Jesus went out into that time of temptation with what Isaiah describes as “righteousness as His belt and faithfulness around His waist”. These “wild beasts” saw Jesus as God the Son, their creator and therefore worshipped Him as such, as He will be their liberator as well. Paul wrote in Romans 8:21-22 that “the creation itself also will be delivered from bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.”
• Angels Ministered to Him: In the Greek means to serve and is in the imperfect tense meaning that their care was continuous. The angelic creation ministered to Him at the end of His temptation which shows that Jesus not only was Creator and Master of that which was created on the earth, He is both Lord and Creator of the heavens as well. They executed the commands of the Father for the Son continually all during the 40 days and nights and Matthew adds that when satan left Jesus they ministered to Him and by this it is referring to Jesus physical needs as they had been attending to eternal needs. This was a test that offered satan’s worst but there was never a doubt that Jesus would pass the test 100%.

For forty days Jesus was tempted:

• By His hunger to wonder whether the Father cared
• By the scope of work, how far He could go apart from the Fathers guidance
• By the offer of the kingdoms of the world what He may gain apart from His sacrifice

Where every other person that has ever been failed at every one of these tests, Jesus never once:

• DOUBTED LOVE
• TRADED TRUST
• QUESTIONED HOPE

Luke 4:14-16

“The beginning of ministry”

• Introduction
• Vs. 14-16 The early days
• Vs. 16-21 Messianic meaning, method, movement, and message

Introduction

You will recall that we started our study in Luke with the writer’s introduction both of his method as well as to whom he was writing too. And in Luke’s 2^nd book, known as Acts, he continues with that introduction as he refers to it in the very first verse saying, “The former account I made, O Theophilus, of all the Jesus began both to do and teach, until the day He was taken up…” The book of Acts continues the work of Jesus after He was taken up through the Holy Spirits indwelling and empowerment through the life of the apostles and in a real since, with those same two works of the Holy Spirit, those that continue His work even till today. 

From that standpoint our examination of “all the Jesus began both to do and teach” is invaluable to Jesus’ servants today as we need to understand and apply His “meaning, method, movement, and message” to carry on Jesus’ work. The church and its servants have no right to alter that work in any way and it is by His work that all His so-called workers will be judged. This is a great reminder to all who read the gospels as they are far more than a mere historical testimony of Jesus earthly ministry, they are a blueprint that must be duplicated if we are to carry on building in His kingdom for His glory! The Christian’s understanding of this should guide their attendance as well as avoidance in the local church body. Our familiarity of Jesus ministry in its “meaning, method, movement and message” must become our guide as to where we are called to serve and fellowship. It is here that we start examining those four aspects of Jesus ministry as they become our present-day blueprint!

  

Vs. 14-15 The early days

Vs. 14-15 The narrative of Luke is simple in these two verses and generally offer the reader a summation of Jesus earthly ministry. The overwhelming point is that of the continuation and intentionality of the Spirits’ power that has guided Him really since His time in the temple 18 years earlier. These two verses indicate to the reader the start of Jesus ministry, but they do not indicate the time between verse 15 and verse 16 other than to note that in verse 14-15 they indicate that Jesus began His ministry in the region of Galilee and that it was primarily located in Synagogues. Whereas verse 16 He is back in His hometown and the Synagogue He grew up in. Some commentators have attempted to examine Jesus’ ministry by dividing it into four parts distinct parts:

• The year of obscurity 
• The year of popularity
• The year of opposition
• The final week and the end

Of the gospel accounts neither Matthew nor Mark mention anything in regard to the year of obscurity. We would not have known of it at all if not for the gospel of John and these two verses in Luke. Matthew in 4:12 and Mark in 1:14 both tell us that Jesus began to teach after John the Baptist was put into prison which was at the 2^nd year of Jesus ministry. Chronologically the events recorded in John 1:19-4:45 all took place during that first year of ministry recorded for us in these two verse in Luke 4:14-15 all of which happened around a year later which means that there is a gap of around a year between Luke chapter 4 and the 15^th verse and 16^th verse. Luke marks what Matthew and Mark commence with starting in 4:31 which is the second ministry of Jesus in the Galilee region and the beginning of Jesus’ ministry in popularity.

Luke marks the transition of these changes in Jesus’ ministry by noting the reaction of the people in each of the stages. For example in verse 14 and 15 we are told that the “news” of Jesus during that first year went out through all the surrounding region and that the response to this was generally being “glorified” by all. The word “news” and “glorified” in the Greek are not as they appear in the English as Luke is simply stating that during that first year of ministry which is recorded in John 1:19-4:45 that the general consensus of Jesus ministry was curiosity as people there heard a rumor about Jesus where they were reporting and talking about Him and that He was spoken of in good terms and this is born out on the 22^nd verse which was around a year later as we are told a year later while in His home town and synagogue that those who had known Him from His youth to adulthood “marveled at the gracious words which proceeded out of His mouth”. 

Then as we look on further in Luke’s account of Jesus ministry we are told in 4:37 as He starts out in His ministry in popularity (recorded for us in Matthew and Mark) “the report about Him went out into every place in the surrounding region” and again in 5:15 where we read “However, the report went around concerning Him all the more; and a great multitude came together to hear and be healed by Him of their infirmities.” Luke records this general consensus of Jesus ministry with the words, “news” and the word “report”. The first word news can be translated “rumor”, and I think that better carries the idea that generally the “rumor” about Jesus’ ministry and teaching was positive. But by the time we get to 4:37 that “rumor” has become a “roar” as that is the Greek word that Luke uses it to indicate that this increase of popularity increased to such a level that in 5:16 Jesus must withdraw Himself into the wilderness just to communion with the Father. And the word used for report in 5:15 is Logos and means that people were not just emotionally responding to Jesus’ ministry, but they were having intellectual comprehension concerning it. 

That is the development given to us by Luke with regards to those that witnessed His ministry over the first year to the 2^nd years: It started out as a rumor, then a roar, and finally moved to a distinct word and message! The word rendered “glorified” doesn’t indicate this in the Greek and instead it is the word where we get our English word doxology from and means praised as being seen as well received by all.                 

Vs. 16-21 Messianic meaning, method, movement, and message

Vs. 16 We need to make sure that we don’t attempt to harmonize this account of Jesus coming to Nazareth in Luke 4:16-30 with the accounts recorded for us in Matthew 13:53-58 and Mark 6:1-6 as they are two separate accounts as pointed out by the Greek scholar A.T. Robertson in his masterful book called “A Harmony of the Gospels”.

Luke’s account is at the very beginning of Jesus great ministry in Galilee whereas Matthew and Marks are near the close of His ministry and outreach in Galilee. What is interesting is to note is the differences and similarities between the two visits by Jesus to His hometown and synagogue. It seems that after a good deal of time from the account before us in Luke, Jesus again goes back to the same location after much more ministry and generally His ministry has progressed from a rumor to a roar to finally comprehension, and Jesus gives them another opportunity to hear Him teach and even to witness a miracle which He would not work for them when demanded but does so for the benefit of the afflicted. And yet STILL with greater reputation and evidence they wouldn’t believe as they use the same excuses for their unbelief! 

I find it captivating to note that in light of what I just said that when Jesus came to Nazareth (twice) each time He made it a practice as He always had to attend the local synagogue. Both in verse 15 and 16 we are told that Jesus visited the local synagogue and by this we know that Jesus began His ministry in a synagogue or to use the Christian language, a church. 

There was an intentionality in Jesus’ method as He started His ministry. In Matthew 15:24 He would say in response to the visitation form gentiles that He “was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” and where better to find them then a local synagogue? These local synagogues dotted the land since the return from the Babylonian captivity. In fact, wherever there were at least 10 Jewish families they had one. 

There was only one Temple, and it was for sacrifice but the center of the Jewish religious life in every little town or village was the synagogue as that it where they primarily worshipped and received instruction on the Sabbath. The Sabbath synagogue service was divided into three parts:

• Worship and prayers
• The reading of the scriptures: Seven people from the congregation read one verse at a time in the books of Moses and three verses at a time in the books of the prophets. 
• The time of teaching: In the local synagogue there was no professional person that always gave the message so the leader of the synagogue who’s duties included inviting any distinguished person to do the teaching which was followed by discussion.   

I have little doubt that over the years of Jesus’ involvement in that local synagogue in Nazareth that there had been many occasions where He disagreed with many things and yet we see that such disagreement NEVER led to abandonment of fellowship. I’m sure that the worship was far then the perfect songs from angels that He was accustomed to and I’m sure that the people that attended were not always behaving as that ought to towards Him and His family, and neither was the teaching correct, yet Jesus still made it a priority to attend services and to even begin His ministry there. While I’m not condoning the above lack in the local church service, but I would say we should never abandon it as become popular to watch on so called “live streaming” which isn’t live unless you are present! Instead I recommend what Jesus did, “start ministry there”!  We shall end here and pick up the rest of the text next time as we will examine in detail:

Vs. 17-21 Messianic meaning, method, movement and message

Vs. 22-30 The reaction in the synagogue

Luke 4:17-21

“The Messianic meaning, method, movement, and message”

• Introduction
• Vs. 17-21 Messianic meaning, method, movement, and message

Introduction

We started this section last week by reminding ourselves of three things:

• The ministry of Jesus that begins here is much more than a historical narrative, in fact it ought to serve todays readers as ablueprint that must be duplicated if we are to carry on building in His kingdom for His glory!
• Second to get the proper interpretation we need to realize the right placement of this passage in correlation to the other gospel accounts. Both Matthew in 4:12 and Mark in 1:14 tell us that Jesus began to teach after John the Baptist was put into prison, which was at the 2^nd year of Jesus ministry. So chronologically the events recorded in John 1:19-4:45 all took place during that first year of ministry recorded for us in the two verses in Luke 4:14-15 where we are told that Jesus returned from the temptation to the first visit to Galilee around a year later before where Matthew and Mark start which was Jesus’ 2^nd visit to this region which Luke writes of in vs.4:31. As also noted for purpose of examination, many divide Jesus’ ministry into four parts which is made up of three years: The first year of obscurity, the second year of popularity, the third year of opposition which also includes the 4^th part of Jesus’ final week with His death burial and resurrection. 
• Finally, we looked at the methodology of Jesus in ministry and noted that whether in Galilee or as in this passage in Nazareth, Jesus taught in synagogues. We noted that Jesus didn’t alter His method to achieve results or responses. We saw this clearly by looking at what Luke records in verses 4:14, 37 and verse 5:15 where the initial reaction of the people to the ministry of Jesus was a rumor in verse 14 which later on in verse 37 has grown to a roar and then finally in verse 5:15 the word which the Greek word used for report namely logos and indicates that the people were now forming more than curiosity or emotional excitement but were now identifying a distinct message and word.   

Vs. 17-21 Messianic meaning, method, movement, and message

Vs. 17 To better understand the messianic meaning and message of Jesus in this section we need to remember that there was only one Temple, and it was for sacrifice but the center of the Jewish religious life in every little town or village was the synagogue, and it had been this way since the return from the Babylonian captivity. The Sabbath synagogue service was divided into three parts:

• Worship and prayers
• The reading of the scriptures: Seven people from the congregation read one verse at a time in the books of Moses and three verses at a time in the books of the prophets. 
• The time of teaching: In the local synagogue there was no professional person that always gave the message so the leader of the synagogue who’s duties included inviting any distinguished person to do the teaching which was followed by discussion.

So now having this clarity we can see that it was during the last part of the sabbath synagogue service that Jesus was asked to teach from the scroll of Isaiah. We should not think that Jesus invited Himself to teach when He stood up to read the passage as that was how the teaching time would go as Jesus was asked to teach then handed the scroll and stood to read it but would then sit down as seen in verse 20 to teach and discuss the teaching. Though our English translation uses the word book, they didn’t have books they only had scrolls, and these scrolls didn’t contain the entire first testament but rather a division within the entire work and in this case it was the prophetic writings and specifically the book of Isaiah. 

Again, we are told that Jesus opened this scroll and the Greek word used is unrolled and the word in verse 17 saying that Jesus found the place where it was written does not indicate that Jesus searched for this specific section as there are 66 chapters in Isaiah today and those chapter divisions and verses were not put in the scriptures at that time. 

We know that the section Jesus read from is Isaiah 61:1-2 which would mean that He would have had to unroll a lot to find this section. Instead, the word found in the Greek indicates that He was guided as if by chance, reading at the place where the scroll opened of its own accord as God clearly guided the text to be communicated.

Vs. 18-19 There are three general things to note about Jesus’ first recorded sermon:

• Note how certain and complete He was of His ministry from the very start. This was no doubt due to several factors, His being filled with the Spirit, His custom of frequenting the synagogue, His knowledge of the Word, and His character of grace. 

Jesus knew Who He was and what He was called to both do and say, and He did so without hesitation nor development. We can see His teaching throughout the gospel records, and never once do they grow more powerful or offer greater clarity than they do from this very first recorded sermon. This has not been my experience, nor of any servant of Christ I’ve ever known. 

The primary reason for this is the very reason we don’t see a progression in Jesus as He was not preoccupied with His self-importance, nor was He consumed by His future as seen by other men. 

He simply and beautifully knew who He was in the Father! There was in His message a direct relationship between His words and His person. He possessed a singularity between Himself and the truth He taught and because of this the knowledge of Himself and the truth He taught were in perfect harmony! 

• Second as I pour over these words of Christ, I can’t help but notice what I alluded to above, and that is His message was singular as was the great theme of His teaching, it was Himself! His words were never to believe this but instead believe in me. 

He didn’t alter that message even in His hometown synagogue amongst those who had watched Him grow up, played with Him on the streets and watched Him as a carpenter. Instead, what is recorded is that on that sabbath day in Nazareth He reads the Messianic prophecy of Isaiah 61:1-2 and triumphantly declares that at this reading it is fulfilled in Him! If this teaching had been delivered by any other teacher it would have been arrogant babblings, but because Jesus spoke the words, it could only have been an indication of Incarnate Divinity.

• Lastly, notice Jesus’ awareness of the human condition as He read aloud Isaiah 61:1-2. His view of humanity was that they were poor, brokenhearted captives, blinded, and oppressed by their own self-inflicted condition. His loving eyes were already keenly aware with clear insight but what this elicited was not anger but pity! 

As bad as humanity’s fallen condition was and still is, notice that the calmness and certainty He was that He alone was and is the remedy to all their miseries! Jesus sat there that day and declared before all the world represented by those that were in that synagogue, that with the fullness of their blindness, bondage, and bruises that He has the sole power not to numb them of the pain of their condition but to cure them of it entirely. 

That message left the hearers with questions: 

Were His words truth or a lie? If they were truth, what and Who is He? 

His message that day spoke words to four groups of people: The poor and as such it was a social gospel, to the brokenhearted and as such it was a healing gospel, to those in need of deliverance and as such it was a gospel of emancipation and as He proclaimed the acceptable year of Jubilee (year of the Lord) it was an enlightening gospel. And through those messages He declared Himself as the Evangelist, Good Physician, Liberator, Revealer, and Glory of His people!              

The reading in Isaiah was from the section of the prophecy that deals with the Servant of Jehovah and the Rabis interpreted this passage to refer to the Messiah and the people gathered in that synagogue that day would have known that. When you compare the words of Isaiah with that of the quotation on Luke you will note the similarities as well as the differences:

• First this quote is essentially the same up to the part where the quote says, “to proclaim liberty to the captives” with the only notable difference that Isaiah uses the words “good tidings” whereas Jesus used the word “gospel”. The word gospel means good tidings so nothing to really note there. 

• The first difference is to be found in the words Isaiah uses after this where we read: “And the opening of the prison to those who are bound.” Where Luke records Jesus’ words as “And recovery of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed”. Luke’s quotation was taken from the Greek Septuagint whereas Isaiah was from the Hebrew text, and this is why there is a difference. 

• The last difference was a deliberate one by our Lord as Luke records in verse 20 that upon reading Isaiah 61:2 and the words “to proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD” that Jesus rolled up the scroll and sat down. When you go back to Isaiah 61:2 you realize that Jesus stopped at a comma, and didn’t finish reading all of verse 2 and 3 which is a continual sentence and says, “And the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all who mourn, to console those who mourn in Zion, to give them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they may be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that He may be glorified.”         

That stoppage was deliberate! The year of the Lord or jubilee as Isaiah put it was an old testament picture as interpreted by Jesus. It was seen by the Jews as described in Leviticus 25, that every 7^th year was to be a sabbatical year or a year of rest for the nation when the land was allowed to rest. And every 50^th year after 7 sabbaticals was to be set apart for a year of Jubilee. The purpose of this was the balancing of the economic system as slaves were set free and returned to their families, property that was sold reverted back to their original owners and all debts were canceled. 

But as Jesus spoke, it went far beyond time and place as our years roll out before us into decades and centuries and our land is where we currently are. But Jesus was looking far beyond time, to a time without end and far beyond this earth to the New heavens and earth! 

Jesus applied it to His ministry, not limiting it to a political or economic condition but in a physical and spiritual sense. The liberty Jesus proclaimed that day was for the human soul which awaits each of us when we pass out of this time and place! His first message was of mercy, grace and hope aimed at all of humanity. 

Judgement lay beyond this message in the background to those who would refuse His message. For those who despise His truth, love, and sacrifice there only remains judgment. Jesus left out “the day of vengeance of our God” and as such it doesn’t belong in the teacher’s sermon and in its place He puts the end at the year of our Lord. Jesus said in John 3:17, “For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” 

So, He concluded His teaching with “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” It is not that Jesus is saying that all that Isaiah spoke was unimportant, but instead His stopping at the comma is just that, as He stopped at where His present ministry in the world was to end the acceptable year of the Lord. 

The rejection of that would usher in “the day of vengeance of our God” and He was not in the world for that yet. What comes after that “the day of vengeance of our God”? Well Isaiah said, “comfort all who mourn, to console those who mourn in Zion, to give them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they may be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that He may be glorified.”

Jesus’ atoning work was not finished on Calvary. His work continues still and won’t be finished until He comes again as the first advent of Jesus demands the second advent of Jesus. The day of vengeance will come, and He will be the instrument of it but notice again the words of Isaiah as even in that this vengeance will come to comfort. 

We conclude our examination of Jesus’ first recorded sermon where He outlined His ministry’s meaning, method, movement, and message! 

Next time we are together we will take up the final movement of Jesus first sermon namely in verses 22-30 The reaction in the synagogue. 

Luke 4:22-30

“The reaction in the synagogue”

• Introduction
• Vs. 22-30 The reaction in the synagogue

Introduction

We come now to the end of Jesus’ first recorded sermon where we started our examination in 4:14-16. By way of reminder we noted in our first study the method of Jesus which we noted ought to be :

• A blueprint that must be duplicated if we are to carry on building in His kingdom for His glory!
• We also looked at the methodology of Jesus in ministry and noted that whether in Galilee or as in this passage in Nazareth, Jesus taught in synagogues. And with Jesus’ confirmed method we noted that He didn’t alter His method to achieve results or responses. We saw this by clearly looking at what Luke records in 4:14, 37 and 5:15 where the initial reaction of the people to the ministry of Jesus was a rumor in verse 14 which later on in verse 37 has grown to a roar and then finally in 5:15 the word which the word used for report namely logos and indicates that the people were now forming more than curiosity or emotional excitement but were now identifying a distinct message and word.    

Next, we took a look at verses 17-21where we saw the Messianic meaning, method, and movement as well as the specific message as Jesus delivered in that synagogue that sabbath day where we took note of:

• What I can only say was divine guidance to the specific passage in Isaiah 61:1-2 as the word “found” in the original Greek indicates.
• The 2^nd thing as a Bible teacher for the better part of 35 years is how certain and complete Jesus was at the start of His teaching ministry. There was no recorded hesitation nor development of Jesus’ teaching throughout the gospel records, and never once do they grow more powerful or offer greater clarity than they do from this very first recorded sermon. That is simply NOT my experience nor of any servant of Christ I’ve ever known. My observation is that in Jesus, He was not preoccupied of His self-importance, nor was He consumed by His future as others. He possessed a singularity between Himself and the truth He taught and because of this the knowledge of Himself and the truth He taught were in perfect harmony! 
• Lastly, the message itself out of Isaiah 61:1-2 was deliberately cut short in mid-sentence from the original. And in this brief teaching Jesus communicated His view of humanity as being, poor, brokenhearted captives, blinded and oppressed by their own self-inflicted condition. But remarkably His loving eyes though keenly aware of humanities condition didn’t elicited anger, but rather pity with Himself being the only remedy!  

When you go back to Isaiah 61:2 you realize that Jesus stopped at a comma and didn’t finish reading all of verse 2 and 3 which is a continual sentence and says, “And the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all who mourn, to console those who mourn in Zion, to give them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they may be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that He may be glorified.” Jesus’ atoning work for all of humanity of all time was not finished on Calvary as Israel’s rejection of Calvary will lead to His 2^nd coming. 

His work continues still and won’t be finished until He comes again as the first advent of Jesus demands the second advent of Jesus. The day of vengeance will come, and He will be the Instrument of it but notice again the words of Isaiah as even in that this vengeance will come in order to comfort.          

His first message was of mercy, grace and hope aimed at all of humanity. Judgement lay beyond this message in the background to those who would refuse His message. It is NOT that Jesus is saying that all that Isaiah spoke was unimportant, but instead His stopping at the comma as this is where His present ministry stopped and when at His 2^nd coming His earthly ministry will commence at the acceptable year of the Lord or as we know it the millennial reign co Christ.

Vs. 22-30 The reaction in the synagogue

Vs. 22-27 The last section for our investigation is the fivefold reaction of the congregation in the synagogue and Jesus words to that reaction which we note are progressive in nature. 

• Marveled at His grace filled words: The first thing we note in verse 22 is that “All bore witness to Him and marveled at His gracious words which proceeded out of His mouth.” Had this been their only reaction it would have at least confirmed the other reports of His teaching from the first year of Galilean ministry but since they also had four other fleshly responses it fails to be a positive response. 

There was a stream of admiration of the grace of the words as He spoke to them which no doubt both included the words of grace Jesus quoted out of Isaiah 61:1-2 as well as the manner in which they were said. This is reflected in the fact that Jesus made those words about Himself and upon the hearing of them fulfilled. Yet with that said instead of stopping there and having admiration for their hometown Son they used this not as a springboard of faith but instead to a pit of doubt and denial. I believe a word of caution is appropriate to all of us students that mere appreciation of Jesus words or works is only the first step, and we must be aware that a first step is only as good as the direction it leads you! The road of doubt and denial is full of those who even now confess admiration for “some of Jesus words and works” yet are nonetheless on a path of destruction!

• Unbelief: As remarkable and memorable as Jesus words were, the sentence isn’t finished before they finished it with unbelief, “Is this not Joseph’s son?” Their use of those words reveal that their unbelief was based not on Jesus’ lack of character growing up, but rather prejudice in a lack of perceived privilege, which they could not reconcile with what they had just heard. That was the basis of their unbelief at the His claim at the beginning of His teaching that in hearing those gracious words, “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” Oh how many times have we read or heard Jesus’ words and have been moved by them only to, in the flesh, be filled with doubt to not believe them? They found a way out of faith, an intellectual method of doubt that could discount His promise and mark this, it is always the same and that is to diminish His character by accounting our limitations to Him. They wanted to believe that they already knew everything about Him that there was to know and He was ONLY Joseph’s son. To this unbelief Jesus demonstrated His true identity by interrupting their thoughts and out loud saying so. Jesus does this by a series of four statements about their unbelief.

Vs. 23 “You will surely say this proverb to Me, Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in Your own country.” This proverb is only recorded by Luke and would naturally appeal to him as a physician. The quote is attributed originally from the Greek Roman physician Alius Galenus considered to be one of the most accomplished of all medical researchers in antiquity as he influenced various scientific disciplines in the fields of anatomy, pathology, pharmacology, and neurology. The fact that Jesus quotes this proverb not only shows the physicians notoriety but also Jesus’ knowledge of current events. The same appeal was used of Jesus on the cross in Matthew 27:40-42 and as used by the doctor who was directed towards doctors who should have cured themselves before attempting to attend to patients. Jesus was aware of the thinking of those in the synagogue that day but their assessment for the reason that the healing that He had done in Capernaum wasn’t duplicated in Nazareth was somehow due to a lack of concern or need on His part but instead it was because of their own unbelief as mentioned in Matthew 13:58 and Mark 6:5 which was on full display in the synagogue that very moment. This also reveals the main culprit of unbelief and that is when our perceived need is unmet, and we blame God for its unfulfillment instead of recognizing that the problem lies with us and not Jesus! Unbelief controls the heart when our first response isn’t repentance!    

Vs. 24 “Assuredly, I say to you, no prophet is accepted in His own country.” After saying this Jesus will offer them from their own history to illustrations of how the power and blessing of God in the past had to be done outside of the nation. Jesus gave the reason why in His own town he was unable to accomplish what they wanted, and He desired. In so doing Jesus places their faith on Him upon the prophetic word above that of astounding works. Works are fulfilled as faith is exercised upon the truth of the Word and never the other way around. Jesus isn’t denying that the His calling as Savior is both Prophet and Physician only that a prophet deserves honor and not doubt and Physician respect who places the needs of His patients above His own.       

Vs. 25-26 “Elijah” 1 Kings 17:8-16. Both of these illustrations come from the prophets, and both are illustrations of mercy shown. The first is to the widow at Zarephath and the 2^nd at Naaman. The similarity between them and Jesus is that unbelief was the cultrate that Jesus and both of the prophets experienced at home which they didn’t experience outside the pale of Judaism. Jesus said that there were many widows in Israel but the benefits and blessings that would have been afforded the nation wasn’t due to lack of opportunity but rather lack of faith. Elijah passed by the Jewish women and helped a Gentile widow in Sidon. The widows in Israel had not the faith to enjoy the blessings God desired to distribute.    

Vs. 27 “Elisha” 2 Kings 5:1-15. Here again the lepers in Israel were there but didn’t receive the blessing of mercy, not because he didn’t care, but because the lepers didn’t trust in the cure, so Elisha is driven to the lepers of the Gentiles in Naaman. In both of these illustrations Jesus’ message of grace and mercy bestowed upon Gentiles was a mighty blow to the proud Jewish exclusivity of Jesus hometown of Nazareth. That Jesus healed in the Jewish community of Capernaum is one thing but Jesus’ assertion that His grace and mercy is available to all Jews and Gentiles alike was to much.           

Verses 28-30 from unbelief to powerlessness

• Vs. 28 Wrath: Truth that was to be applied and enlightening when rejected will accuse then cause wrath. That is just as true today across Christian hearts as was across Jewish hearts. People want gracious words but if they fail to see the truth, even gracious words will harden hearts! Jesus was saying that in God’s kingdom He is drawn to faith and NOT in obligation to racial identity.  
• Vs. 29 Hostility: At Jesus’ first recorded teaching we see not widespread acceptance but the opposite. Sometimes you can tell the anointing of the message NOT upon how many receive but how many reject it! It is to those that reject it the truth that will experience Isaiah 61:1-2 and the wrath of God and Jesus stopping at mid-sentence indicates His willingness that they would be open to His message of grace and mercy. The same word of God that is meant for grace and mercy when rejected is a sword and is at war that soon will become a poison, a scandal and a stumbling block to those who reject it.   
• Vs. 30 Powerlessness: The last reaction to Jesus first recorded sermon in His hometown is seen in the inability to throw Jesus off the cliff. 

Rejecting the truth of the Word never makes one powerful, it only demonstrates that rejection of truth makes a person powerless. No shouts of anger at truth will ever alter the truth rejected, but it will demonstrate that that the fallen human will only make a demonstration of rebellion but can never overturn the truth! 

The people of the Nazareth synagogue desired to see some miracle brought before them that Sabbath day and rejected Jesus who upon the rejection in anger attempted to throw Him off a cliff only to witness before their own eyes His miraculous escape through their very midst. They got their miracle, but it was at the cost of Jesus’ escape from their presence.  

Luke 4:31-44

“The demonstration of Jesus daily ministry”

• Introduction
• Vs. 31-37 In the synagogue
• Vs. 38-39 In the home
• Vs. 40-41 In the street
• Vs. 42-44 In the desert

Introduction

We left off our study with the reaction to Jesus’ teaching in His home synagogue in Nazareth and we open this section in a different location. Whenever I begin a study I do so with the same goal in mind “to have an encounter with Jesus”. It is always my aim at the start and finish of my study to say that when completed that I have been with Jesus. My point in saying this is that this greatly influences my method or approach in study. I start out reading the passage then making mental notes of questions that come up in my reading. Those observations are what will often guide my research into finding the interpretation and answers. This will in turn direct me into personal application which will prayerfully lead to my goal. 

As I read this passage from verses 31-44 there were two primary questions that came to mind, and those led to a third question: “Is there any correlation between these two questions?” So, before we get started on the four individual stories, our understanding of those questions will aid us in the context of the story as Luke intended it to be understood:

• Why the change in location? When I cross reference this passage with the other gospel records I came to realize that according to Mathew 4:13 Jesus didn’t just come for a short-term mission as Matthew says that Jesus “dwelt” in Capernaum. Then in Matthew 9:1 he refers to Capernaum as “His own city”. So what necessitated the transition from Nazareth to Capernaum? And does such a move in ministry location give us any insight into Jesus’ ministry? 

The public ministry of Christ changed at this time to some 20 miles Northeast of Nazareth to the North shores of the Sea of Galilee. There were over 200 towns and villages that dotted the coast around the Sea of Galilee and the Jewish Roman historian Josephus tells us that Capernaum was center of the activity of all those communities. 

Geographically this location was important as three major roadways converged at Capernaum, from this city there was a major road that led to Tyre and Sidon, and you could also travel to Damascus and for the Jews you could travel to Jerusalem. 

But what was the main reason that Jesus made Capernaum His base of operation? 

I suppose that it may have been a reason as we note that Jesus often left Capernaum to minister but always returned to the city. When you research the city, you will find out two very interesting things about it:

1.  First according to Matthew 4:12-16 it had a negative connotation associated with it from the prophet of Isaiah in 9:1-2 over 400 years prior. The fact that God revealed through the prophet Isaiah the contempt that Galilee would have among the Jews in the future makes Jesus’ choice of it as the base of His ministry even more interesting as clearly those was not an accident. 

By referring to it as Galilee of the Gentiles does not mean that it was inhabited by mainly Gentiles as it was NOT. Instead, the words mean that it was held in contempt because it was “worldly progressive” in that it was heavily influenced by Gentiles and as such was seen by the Jews as being powerlessagainst stemming the tide of worldly influence.

•  The second thing I note is that Jesus’ deliberate change of ministry headquarters happened at the same time that Herod the tetrarch had placed John the Baptist in prison. What makes this interesting is as far as Israel was concerned Herod was the most powerful man in Israel and his region of authority was the Galilee region and his chief city of influence and power would have been Capernaum. 

And it is to this city that the Jews say is powerLESS, and the worldly authorities saw as powerFUL, that Jesus made His ministry headquarters for the remainder of His earthly ministry! 

I can only suggest that this was a direct decision and calculation by our Lord Jesus, and that placing His earthly preaching ministry in this city at this time was purposeful and not based upon convenience nor accidental. 

It would seem to me that His deliberate change of headquarters had something to do with both of the two facts, and clearly Jesus wanted His ministry to reveal what true power looked like, and that even in the worst of locations when all of the Jews saw Capernaum as a God forsaken place the power of Jesus’ ministry could not be thwarted. 

• Why does Luke give us four vignettes of Jesus’ ministry that happened all on the same day? It is something that we notice as Luke is careful to give a time stamp on each of these four ministry opportunities, all happening within a 24-hour period of time. This observation comes about by noting these specific time stamps on each of these stories in the text as they indicate by Luke that all of these stories took place on the same day which was on the Sabbath day according to verse 31:

1. Verse 31-33 we are told that the first location Jesus was teaching them on the Sabbath and verse 33 indicates that this would have been in the morning hours as they were in the Synagogue. 

• Verses 38-39 we are again told by Luke that Jesus arose from the synagogue which clearly indicates that this was just hours later from His time in the Synagogue as He entered Simon’s house to attend to Simon’s (Peter) mother-in-law at Peter’s own home which would have been early afternoon. 

• Verses 40-41 as the day got later Luke again is careful as he informs his readers that the time of day was “as the sun was sitting” which again informs us that it was still the same day when we see Jesus out in the streets of Capernaum as crowds came about Him as He lay hands on the sick and cast out demons.

• Verses 42-44 finally we are told that this period of time in the ministry in the streets took most of the night as Luke informs us in verse 42 that “when it was day…. He departed and went into the deserted place”. Note that throughout the night hours Jesus departed, but even there the crowds found Him and He tried to leave but their need kept Him lingering longer and finally He told them that there were other places He must preach the kingdom of God. 

That leads me to the last question, “Is there any correlation between these two questions?” I believe that Luke sets Jesus’ ministry in direct contrast between the area in which it occurred namely Capernaum, and the prevailing thought that nothing of power and authority could be accomplished in that town or that area as it was the seat of “worldly progressive power and authority”. 

The contrast is not only against the location but also that what the world and Jews may have seen as worldly power and authority was no match for true Godly power and authority! Notice with regards to true change, that power and authority of Jesus was limitless both in what His power and authority can accomplish, the completeness of it, and its universal impact. 

Simply put, Jesus accomplished in one day what all of humanity could not have accomplished in 1000 lifetimes!  We will take up each of these stories individually as we continue in the next weeks but in the time I have remaining, I want to focus of the generalities of these four stories and there locations as I believe that it ministers to the needs of humanity:

1. The synagogue: Here we have the religious life and its power and authority over those things that can possess the human soul, thus true moral authority and power. And it is seen clearly that what has the most impact upon the morality of the hopeless and lost in society is the Word of God, as we note that is what Jesus employed in verses 32-35. 

We will get into much greater detail on this and all four of our stories, but that is what I see in this first story. Jesus has the power to change the moral corruption of the human soul, and He does so without legislation and social programs that governments have long tried, and He can do so with the exercise of the Word of God.

• The Home: Next we are taken to Peter’s house where his mother-in-law was overtaken by a severe fever. What does this story convey to us about true power and authority? Well not only do we have the healing of her, but I can’t help but notice that this was a family member, so I believe that Jesus’ power and authority are not limited only to the physical needs of the home but also their emotional impact upon the needs of the family as well. 

Also note specifically that such healing physically and emotionally didn’t come about the way the world employes it through long periods of appointments and therapy, NO she was well instantly and fit for service. Oh, how utterly powerful is our Lord in this much needed area of the home! Whenever Jesus is allowed to “stand over” and speak rebuke upon the areas that have left us devastated the results are the same.      

• The streets: Here out in the streets of common humanity apart from religious and relational connection of the first two ministry locations, we see Jesus isn’t limited here either. In fact one could make the argument that in sheer numbers this was His most effective area of ministry that day as He was there the longest and saw the most people. Neither was there a case that He wasn’t effective in correcting in His power and authority, as we are told that “all those who had any that were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and He laid hands on every one of them and He healed them.”

The world needs a touch from Jesus, and it appears to me that He didn’t lack the power, nor authority over all that ailed humanity even outside of the religious and relations to Him, as long as they came to Him and received a touch by Him. So, we see that Jesus has the power over all the physical needs that inflicts humanity. And what is of interest is that they didn’t need to go to church as He went to them! Also notice that like the above two stories, we don’t read that they need any length of recovery time. Notice that with this group Luke also records that they were also sick in the soul as they were possessed by demons. And think that this reveals a lot about the first case in the synagogue as perhaps someone brought that man into the synagogue of religion in hopes of deliverance but had as, yet it hadn’t happened.

• The deserted place: The last place that Luke guides his readers to is the deserted place, and by this I see it as equally essential for the power and authority of God. I think this area may affect more of humanity than all others together and that has to do with a sense of peace and the presence of God that grants us rest in Him. What I see here is that such a rest is so complete that it can be interrupted and disturbed by the needs of others and yet still accomplish what a year’s vacation could never accomplish over a lifetime.

What Governmental program can achieve lasting peace and rest of the human spirit? Jesus alone, and  in a relationship with Him has granted us true rest as He said in Matthew 11:28-30 “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.  For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.”   

We will leave the details to another day but what great power and authority Jesus can and desires to have if we will but let Him!           

Luke 4:31-37

“Ministry In the synagogue”

• Introduction
• Vs. 31-37 In the synagogue

Introduction

We pick up our study in verses 31-44 having already set the context of this section as a contrast between what the world and the Jews considered power and authority compared to Jesus’ demonstration of it. I mentioned that as I read this passage that there were three questions that came to mind: 

• Why did Jesus change ministry base? This we noted in verse 31 and I brought out the fact that this change was not accidental but rather deliberate and it was not based solely upon geography of being at the intersection of three major roads but rather that it was according to Matthew do to a 400-year-old prophecy of Isaiah on how this region would be seen as “God forsaken”. Simply put Capernaum was a case study of “If Jesus can do a work here then it could be done anywhere.” This was also contrasted next to the world power of Herod who was the tetrarch over this very region.

• Why does Luke under the direction of the Holy Spirit direct the readers interest into these four stories that all transpired on the same day? I believe the sheer variety of afflictions combined with them all being on the same day with complete and absolute healing are all indications of the superiority of power and authority of our Lord’s ministry. 
•  “Is there any correlation between these two questions?” The answer to me is an absolute YES as they set forth the reality of the person and identity as well as the effectiveness of the ministry of Jesus. 

Also of note is that these four events not only happened on the same day with complete and resounding success they also happened in four very different locations and again all of this was on the same day. 

1. Verse 31-33 The Synagogue: Here our view is upon the religious life and its power and authority over the moral equation of humanity specifically those things that can “possess” the human soul. And here we see the true moral authority and power of the Word made flesh.

• Verses 38-39 The Home: Here we are taken to Peter’s house where his mother-in-law was overtaken by a severe fever. We not only have the healing of her, but as she was a family member, we note Jesus’ power and authority are not limited only to the physical needs of the home but also their emotional impact upon the needs of the family as well. 

• Verses 40-41 The streets: Out in the streets of common humanity apart from religious and relational connection of the first two ministry locations, we see Jesus isn’t limited here either. In fact one could make the argument that in sheer numbers and variety of healings this was His most effective area of ministry that day as He was there the longest and saw the most people with the greatest number of transformations and they weren’t hindered or less effective in this location when compared with the two previous.

• Verses 42-44 The deserted place: Here I see an equally essential need for the power and authority of God. Personally I think this area may effect more of humanity then all others together combined and that has to do with a sense of peace and the presence of God that grants us rest in Him. 

We will now take a close examination of each of these locations and the ministry of our Lord so we can witness the specifics of the absolute power and authority of Jesus’ ministry. 

Vs. 31-37 In the synagogue

 Vs. 31b-37 This story really breaks apart at three points during Jesus’ time that morning in the synagogue in Capernaum:

• 31b-32 Jesus’ teaching ministry: Here I’m curious as to what Jesus taught them as we are told in their reaction to His teaching that they were “astonished at His teaching, for His word was with authority”. My questions are based upon their reaction to Jesus’ teaching:
•  Was their reaction due to some new teaching? 
• If not, How did Jesus’ teaching differ from what they were familiar with that caused this reaction? 

To answer the first question we only need to go to Jesus own words as recorded for us by Luke in 24:44. To give you the setting of this quote, Jesus had already been to the cross and He was alive from the dead and He is talking to His disciples having a Bible study with them when He says, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” 

Jesus mentions the three divisions of the Old Testament (the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms) then He says that “this is what He taught while He was among them”. 

So we know that Jesus taught on in this synagogue. What apparently changed was His interpretation and application of those three sections as He taught that those things in the scriptures must be fulfilled in Him. As we look out at the landscape of modern churches many churches today think that the Bible has nothing to say to people today, it’s out of dateand out of touch with what humanity is facing NOW. There is even a thought among some bible teachers that we shouldn’t spend any time in the Law of Moses or the Old testament in general as it is fulfilled in Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection and though this is true in the sense of righteousness, (we do nothing to earn God’s love, favor and righteousness) it is NOT so as the bases of morality as the moral code which the Law of Moses proclaimed is not altered by Jesus’ life and death. 

Again, let’s go back and look at what Jesus had to say on this subject in Matthew 5:19 where He taught, “Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” 

I believe that we can clearly see that Jesus didn’t encourage us to abandon the teaching of the Old Testament nor the Law of Moses. We can see what Jesus was teaching and what He was against that caused the reaction that day in the synagogue when we look a Matthew 15:7-9 where Jesus quotes Isaiah 29:13 “ Hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy about you, saying:‘These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’”

What Jesus was teaching that caused a reaction was that was He was denouncing teachers for teaching tradition, instead of truth. They did this by adding to the Law of Moses traditions of the Mishnah and quoting each other in support of their traditions. Jesus didn’t quote what the rabis taught and tradition, instead Jesus taught the whole council of the Hebrew scriptures, and He taught that those things spoken about must be fulfilled in Him. 

Jesus wasn’t denouncing the Law of Moses, He was not diminishing the Old Testament as being outdated, He was doing the exact opposite! In describing this the reaction of the congregation Luke is NOT suggesting that the rabis or even the Scribes had no authority as they were well aware of their authoritative teaching as they submitted to their teaching. Instead, their assessment was in the difference of authority that they witnessed in Jesus. 

The rabis and scribes’ authority came from their earthly position being from the seat of Moses but when they listened to Jesus, His teaching had a different authority one derived out of conviction and not one passed upon position! 

Those in the synagogue knew nothing of Jesus’ heavenly position but listening to Him they nonetheless witnessed it and instantly could see the difference in the truth Jesus taught as being absolute truth and not based upon others’ opinions!         

• Vs. 33-35 The deliverance of the demon possessed man: What I’m interested in is exactly what took place and how Luke describes it as we are still being taken to the completeness of Jesus power and authority. I suppose that nothing at that time was more hopeless in the face of supernatural power than witnessing a demon possessed person. I find that interesting that at this very time of the congregations’ assessment that they are interrupted right when they are drawing conclusions and comparisons with regards to the power and authority of the word of God being taught. 

Nothing is known of this man that was demon possessed, we don’t know if this was his first sabbath or if he was a regular member, neither do we know how long he had been in this condition. What are given is his deliverance that sabbath morning. It is here that we need to clean up our English translations as in the NKJV we are told that in verses 33-34 that “he cried out with a loud voice saying, Let us alone.” All Greek scholars agree at this point as the words, “leave us alone” is a part of a Greek verb that marks terror, and the Revised version just renders this as the demon creaming out “ahhhh” as there was no appeal from the demon. And notice that Dr. Luke is very specific here in saying that this man was possessed with an “unclean” demon making a diagnosis as this variety of demon was markedly filthy and beastly and not your run of the mill demonic possession. Before the demon’s appeal there was a recognition of Jesus’ power and authority seen in terror. 

This demon knew what the congregation was questioning regarding Jesus’ power and authority that Jesus’ power and authority was absolute! It is then that the appeal from the demon is made in verse 34 which is as much a protest and confession as it is an appeal: “What have we to do with You, Jesus of Nazareth? Did you come to destroy us? I know who You are—the Holy One of God!” In the Greek we have greater clarity as literally the demon said to Jesus, “What is there to us and to thee” that is to ask what do we have in common? And this question was more of a statement as the demon follows this by recognizing that they have nothing in common as Jesus has greater power and the ability to destroy instantly at His word the demon and that this power and authority comes from His identity as being the ONLY Holy One of God. Again, remember that this whole scene interrupted the congregation’s question as to the type of power and authority Jesus had and the demon answered their question! 

What follows is Jesus’ reaction to the testimony of this demon to the congregation and that is to refuse the testimony as Jesus’ first words to this demon is “be muzzled or gagged” today we may say that Jesus told the demon to “shut up” that was Jesus’ reaction to the demon’s testimony, a strong rebuke. The demonic underworld knew Him, but Jesus refused their testimony with a rebuke and a deliverance. What happened was an immediate response to the authority of Jesus’ Word as Luke describes in medical terms a convulsion in which Luke again describes in medical terms that the demon came out and the man was not hurt in “any possible way”! 

• Vs. 36-37 The 2^nd reaction of the congregation: I say the 2^ndreaction as there first reaction was to Jesus’ teaching, and it seems that after this they went back to their assessment of Jesus power and authority of the word as it was greater than they first realized. They had listened to Jesus’ teaching, and their response was “astonishment” but here Luke employs a different word to denote their reaction to Jesus words as Luke says that they were in “amazement”. When we see the words “astonishment” it conveys the idea of surprise whereas the word “amazement” is the word that means dumbfounded or blown away! 

They first felt the moral impact of Jesus’ teaching and it surprised them and then in the midst of that surprise came the demonstration of Jesus teaching which went beyond interpretation to demonstration of His absolute authority and power for transformation. Jesus’ teaching wasn’t mere theory or opinion it was a demonstration of the reality of the truth He taught. When they recovered their speech, they were greatly impressed by what had taken place at that synagogue service that morning. They were not tricks of the professional exorcist, no incantations or performance! There was only Jesus and His Word and at that power and authority, “He commands the unclean spirits, and they come out.” The rumor was now a riot of communication as to Who this man Jesus is!             

When we get back together we will look at the remainder of this passage in:

Vs. 38-39 In the home

Vs. 40-41 In the street

Vs. 42-44 In the desert